Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
General Pedagogical Methods
When it comes to pedagogical methods, we have included quite a variety of
methods, to
cater for different learning styles. Therefore, our lecturers deliver
classes and supervised
hours in traditional methods, or using case studies, promoting collaborative
learning, through
simulations and experiential learning, field trips, seminars, tutorials and
workshops.
Throughout the programme, students will engage in lectures and case studies,
allowing
them to apply their knowledge and skills in a real-world setting. The
modules will be
delivered through face-to-face lectures and face-to-face tutorials whereby
relevant literature
is reviewed with students and discussions are encouraged.
Students are expected to be proactive in their own learning through
independent study and
self-directed learning. Students will develop a sense of responsibility
through class
discussions on various ethical issues involved in leadership decisions.
Both students who apply for the programme on a part-time or full-time basis
will receive the
same style of teaching and learning (i.e. mixed methods to cater for
different learning styles
as indicated in the different modules mentioned below), however for
part-time students, the
duration of the programme will be double that of the full-time students, and
part-time
students will have between 1–2 modules per semester, to ensure that they are
able to
manage their time well.
For the online programme, all components will be delivered online. Modes of
delivery include
podcasts, video clips, assigned readings, asynchronous forums, virtual
office hours, and pre-
recorded expert interviews. The material will draw from academic and
professional literature,
present real-world case studies, and present opportunities for collaborative
learning through
group projects, case study discussions and peer feedback.
General Assessment Methods
Assessment throughout the programme is varied and designed to measure
different aspects
of student learning and competence. Methods include:
Individual assignments requiring critical analysis and application of theory
to practice; group
projects that foster collaborative skills; case study analyses that develop
analytical thinking;
presentations to build communication competence; reflective journals for
personal
development tracking; examinations that test theoretical understanding;
coaching sessions
demonstrating practical application of leadership skills; and a research
dissertation that
showcases advanced research capabilities.
All assessments are designed to align with the programme learning outcomes
and are
subject to internal and external quality assurance processes. Students
receive constructive
feedback on all assessed work, enabling them to identify areas for
improvement and build on
their strengths.
Grading and Progression
For each module, students are required to achieve the minimum pass mark.
Students who
fail the module have an opportunity to resit. Should the student fail a
second time, they will
need to repeat the complete module.
The programme uses a grading scale that reflects student achievement across
different
levels of performance. The grading criteria are communicated to students at
the start of each
module, and detailed marking rubrics are provided for each assessment.
Internal verification
and external examination processes ensure consistency and fairness in
grading across the
programme.